<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Camacho Select</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stogiereview.com/2010/03/18/camacho-select-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2010/03/18/camacho-select-2/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=camacho-select-2</link>
	<description>Cigar reviews with a video twist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:25:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stefan Nychka</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2010/03/18/camacho-select-2/#comment-101620</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Nychka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 20:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=7641#comment-101620</guid>
		<description>I tried one recently, straight from the tobacconist&#039;s.  It was a robusto extra, I believe (seemed about 5 1/2 x 52 or 54).

It wasn&#039;t horrible, so no extreme sourness, but it wasn&#039;t incredible.  Average, I&#039;d say, and fairly mild flavours.  I personally may try 1 again just to make sure, but that&#039;ll be it if I have the same experience.

I did notice, especially towards the end, that I had to let it sit a long time between puffs, likely 2-3 minutes as opposed to 1-2 minutes.  Note, too, I normally prefer stronger-flavoured cigars, which usually but not always means a stronger nicotine content.

So, I&#039;d say it&#039;s worth trying 1 or 2 for someone who likes a milder flavour, and then deciding for yourself.  Note it&#039;s still probably at least medium-bodied (i.e., a medium-amount of nicotine).

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried one recently, straight from the tobacconist&#8217;s.  It was a robusto extra, I believe (seemed about 5 1/2 x 52 or 54).</p>
<p>It wasn&#8217;t horrible, so no extreme sourness, but it wasn&#8217;t incredible.  Average, I&#8217;d say, and fairly mild flavours.  I personally may try 1 again just to make sure, but that&#8217;ll be it if I have the same experience.</p>
<p>I did notice, especially towards the end, that I had to let it sit a long time between puffs, likely 2-3 minutes as opposed to 1-2 minutes.  Note, too, I normally prefer stronger-flavoured cigars, which usually but not always means a stronger nicotine content.</p>
<p>So, I&#8217;d say it&#8217;s worth trying 1 or 2 for someone who likes a milder flavour, and then deciding for yourself.  Note it&#8217;s still probably at least medium-bodied (i.e., a medium-amount of nicotine).</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loudog</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2010/03/18/camacho-select-2/#comment-91755</link>
		<dc:creator>Loudog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 02:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=7641#comment-91755</guid>
		<description>Hey Jerry thanks for the review. I heard you don&#039;t like the knuckles, if you want I&#039;ll buy them off you. Just let me know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Jerry thanks for the review. I heard you don&#8217;t like the knuckles, if you want I&#8217;ll buy them off you. Just let me know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2010/03/18/camacho-select-2/#comment-91739</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=7641#comment-91739</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d love to take some 5 Vegas Miami Knuckle off your hands, never honestly had ANY 5 Vegas cigars. Always appreciate the reviews!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d love to take some 5 Vegas Miami Knuckle off your hands, never honestly had ANY 5 Vegas cigars. Always appreciate the reviews!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stogie Guys Friday Sampler CLXXXI</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2010/03/18/camacho-select-2/#comment-91730</link>
		<dc:creator>Stogie Guys Friday Sampler CLXXXI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=7641#comment-91730</guid>
		<description>[...] the Blogs: The Stogie Guys, via the Daily Caller, feature the La Flor Dominicana Mysterio Oscuro. Stogie Review lights up a Camacho Select. Nice Tight Ash fires up a Padilla Cazadores. Cigar Inspector inspects a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Blogs: The Stogie Guys, via the Daily Caller, feature the La Flor Dominicana Mysterio Oscuro. Stogie Review lights up a Camacho Select. Nice Tight Ash fires up a Padilla Cazadores. Cigar Inspector inspects a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jannskee</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2010/03/18/camacho-select-2/#comment-91721</link>
		<dc:creator>Jannskee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=7641#comment-91721</guid>
		<description>CALL YOUR REPRESENTATIVES TODAY AND TELL THEM TO VOTE NO ON HEALTHCARE!!!    SAVE OUR CIGAR RIGHTS, THEY WILL BE GONE IF THIS BILL PASSES!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CALL YOUR REPRESENTATIVES TODAY AND TELL THEM TO VOTE NO ON HEALTHCARE!!!    SAVE OUR CIGAR RIGHTS, THEY WILL BE GONE IF THIS BILL PASSES!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JC</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2010/03/18/camacho-select-2/#comment-91719</link>
		<dc:creator>JC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=7641#comment-91719</guid>
		<description>Strictly by coincidence about a week ago my golf buddy and I both pulled these out to enjoy during a round....needless to say neither one of us got to far.......these were bad. Reading this review and comments I guess I am not alone!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strictly by coincidence about a week ago my golf buddy and I both pulled these out to enjoy during a round&#8230;.needless to say neither one of us got to far&#8230;&#8230;.these were bad. Reading this review and comments I guess I am not alone!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavefromPhilly</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2010/03/18/camacho-select-2/#comment-91718</link>
		<dc:creator>DavefromPhilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=7641#comment-91718</guid>
		<description>I had one of these guys last September, I love Camaroons, and after hearing alot of good i thought there was something wrong with me for hating this cigar.... At least i&#039;m not alone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had one of these guys last September, I love Camaroons, and after hearing alot of good i thought there was something wrong with me for hating this cigar&#8230;. At least i&#8217;m not alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.003 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 381/382 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.stogiereview.com @ 2012-02-09 06:32:14 -->
