<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cubao Maduro</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stogiereview.com/2009/11/09/cubao-maduro/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2009/11/09/cubao-maduro/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=cubao-maduro</link>
	<description>Cigar reviews with a video twist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 07:18:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Warren</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2009/11/09/cubao-maduro/#comment-86765</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Warren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 14:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=5909#comment-86765</guid>
		<description>I have a completely different take on this cigar. It is important to keep in mind that everyone&#039;s palate is different. The Cubao maduro is signifcantly more strong than the natural. It is of no surprise to me that many people who enjoy the natural are not as fond of the maduro....just as many people I know love mild to medium cigars that to me have little or no taste. I found the Cubao maduro to be packed full of flavor and spice; not just raw strength that you find with some of the new cigars on the market whose purpose is to exploit the current trend towards fuller bodied cigars. I rarely respond to any reviews I read on-line, but I would hate for people to neglect trying this cigar based on one review from someone whose palate is probably much different than their own.I think this is an incredible cigar on whole for those of us who enjoy cigars that are full of flavor and spice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a completely different take on this cigar. It is important to keep in mind that everyone&#8217;s palate is different. The Cubao maduro is signifcantly more strong than the natural. It is of no surprise to me that many people who enjoy the natural are not as fond of the maduro&#8230;.just as many people I know love mild to medium cigars that to me have little or no taste. I found the Cubao maduro to be packed full of flavor and spice; not just raw strength that you find with some of the new cigars on the market whose purpose is to exploit the current trend towards fuller bodied cigars. I rarely respond to any reviews I read on-line, but I would hate for people to neglect trying this cigar based on one review from someone whose palate is probably much different than their own.I think this is an incredible cigar on whole for those of us who enjoy cigars that are full of flavor and spice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OlivaSerieV</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2009/11/09/cubao-maduro/#comment-85859</link>
		<dc:creator>OlivaSerieV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 23:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=5909#comment-85859</guid>
		<description>Thats what we luv about the Great Torpedo. If he does not enjoy a cigar he has the balls to come out and say it even if some of the people in the industry who he likes to be friends with will not be happy with him.

TRUTH brother of the leaf thats what we want to hear... even if the manufacturer sends you box after box of samples give us the stone cold brutal truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats what we luv about the Great Torpedo. If he does not enjoy a cigar he has the balls to come out and say it even if some of the people in the industry who he likes to be friends with will not be happy with him.</p>
<p>TRUTH brother of the leaf thats what we want to hear&#8230; even if the manufacturer sends you box after box of samples give us the stone cold brutal truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2009/11/09/cubao-maduro/#comment-85842</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=5909#comment-85842</guid>
		<description>I tried one of the torps last night and I enjoyed it. I plan on picking up a couple more to try.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried one of the torps last night and I enjoyed it. I plan on picking up a couple more to try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stogie Guys Friday Sampler CLXVII</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2009/11/09/cubao-maduro/#comment-85820</link>
		<dc:creator>Stogie Guys Friday Sampler CLXVII</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 08:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=5909#comment-85820</guid>
		<description>[...] Around the Blogs: Keepers of the Flame breaks down five Arganese blends. Stogie Review fires up the Cuban Maduro. Nice Tight Ash lights up a San Cristobal Seleccion Del Sol. Cohiba Club [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Around the Blogs: Keepers of the Flame breaks down five Arganese blends. Stogie Review fires up the Cuban Maduro. Nice Tight Ash lights up a San Cristobal Seleccion Del Sol. Cohiba Club [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DW</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2009/11/09/cubao-maduro/#comment-85712</link>
		<dc:creator>DW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=5909#comment-85712</guid>
		<description>Too bad on the cigar. It&#039;s disappointing to come across an anticipated cigar to be disappointed. As for aging, if it&#039;s uneventful now, it&#039;ll probably be uneventful later. Aging cigars mellows them out and sometime allows more of the subtle flavors to blossom. I&#039;m no expert, but I&#039;m learning from the tobacconist here. Like some say, &quot;A bad cigar will always be a bad cigar.&quot; And based on your review of this cigar, I don&#039;t think it would be worth my time in trying to age it,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad on the cigar. It&#8217;s disappointing to come across an anticipated cigar to be disappointed. As for aging, if it&#8217;s uneventful now, it&#8217;ll probably be uneventful later. Aging cigars mellows them out and sometime allows more of the subtle flavors to blossom. I&#8217;m no expert, but I&#8217;m learning from the tobacconist here. Like some say, &#8220;A bad cigar will always be a bad cigar.&#8221; And based on your review of this cigar, I don&#8217;t think it would be worth my time in trying to age it,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don &#34;Cruz&#34;ado</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2009/11/09/cubao-maduro/#comment-85690</link>
		<dc:creator>Don &#34;Cruz&#34;ado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=5909#comment-85690</guid>
		<description>John - You obviously didn&#039;t watch the review or didn&#039;t pay attention to the review or any of our reviews.  First, in the video I said I BOUGHT these from W.Curtis Drapers.  They were not samples.  Second, like with any review (unless we say otherwise) I smoked 4 of these for this review.  Third, I have on good authority that you handle the Miami Cigar Co Twitter account so your comment seems a bit biased.  But in case my sources are wrong, its cool to disagree but there is no need to call into question our review process just because you don&#039;t agree.  Your comment could&#039;ve ended after the second sentence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John &#8211; You obviously didn&#8217;t watch the review or didn&#8217;t pay attention to the review or any of our reviews.  First, in the video I said I BOUGHT these from W.Curtis Drapers.  They were not samples.  Second, like with any review (unless we say otherwise) I smoked 4 of these for this review.  Third, I have on good authority that you handle the Miami Cigar Co Twitter account so your comment seems a bit biased.  But in case my sources are wrong, its cool to disagree but there is no need to call into question our review process just because you don&#8217;t agree.  Your comment could&#8217;ve ended after the second sentence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Brooke - The Weekly Cigar</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2009/11/09/cubao-maduro/#comment-85688</link>
		<dc:creator>John Brooke - The Weekly Cigar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=5909#comment-85688</guid>
		<description>I completely disagree. I thought this was a great cigar, with rich flavors of cocoa and some spice. I&#039;m wondering how many you smoked for the review? One, two three? Where did you get your samples? I&#039;ve had a handful of these, and they&#039;ve all been really nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely disagree. I thought this was a great cigar, with rich flavors of cocoa and some spice. I&#8217;m wondering how many you smoked for the review? One, two three? Where did you get your samples? I&#8217;ve had a handful of these, and they&#8217;ve all been really nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.018 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 382/382 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.stogiereview.com @ 2012-02-09 02:24:21 -->
