<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Perdomo Lot 23 Maduro (Twitter Review)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stogiereview.com/2009/10/25/perdomo-lot-23-maduro-twitter-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2009/10/25/perdomo-lot-23-maduro-twitter-review/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=perdomo-lot-23-maduro-twitter-review</link>
	<description>Cigar reviews with a video twist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:43:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: CigarsThomas</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2009/10/25/perdomo-lot-23-maduro-twitter-review/#comment-84592</link>
		<dc:creator>CigarsThomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 04:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=5779#comment-84592</guid>
		<description>too bad there was so much confusion.......i had one of these to smoke but ended up taking the wife out to breakfast when I found out walt had cancelled.......

Great review elsewise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>too bad there was so much confusion&#8230;&#8230;.i had one of these to smoke but ended up taking the wife out to breakfast when I found out walt had cancelled&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>Great review elsewise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bud</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2009/10/25/perdomo-lot-23-maduro-twitter-review/#comment-84549</link>
		<dc:creator>Bud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=5779#comment-84549</guid>
		<description>Vic,

I&#039;m not sure whether you referring to KnightRid&#039;s burn issues or mine.  My humidor averages 68 Degrees and  64% RH with beads as the humidification device.   This particular stick sat in my humidor for two weeks prior to the review.  Should probably have made note of that somewhere in the review.

If you were referring to KnightRid&#039;s problems I think they were due to the holes that he found in the stick.  Maybe KnightRid will comment in on this and let us know what conditions his stick was stored at.

All in all I thought it was a good stick and the burn issues that I experienced would not stop me from purchasing more in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vic,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure whether you referring to KnightRid&#8217;s burn issues or mine.  My humidor averages 68 Degrees and  64% RH with beads as the humidification device.   This particular stick sat in my humidor for two weeks prior to the review.  Should probably have made note of that somewhere in the review.</p>
<p>If you were referring to KnightRid&#8217;s problems I think they were due to the holes that he found in the stick.  Maybe KnightRid will comment in on this and let us know what conditions his stick was stored at.</p>
<p>All in all I thought it was a good stick and the burn issues that I experienced would not stop me from purchasing more in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VicDamone</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2009/10/25/perdomo-lot-23-maduro-twitter-review/#comment-84515</link>
		<dc:creator>VicDamone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 00:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=5779#comment-84515</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s funny because I smoked a lot 23 maduro the other day. I got a sampler pack from cigars international that had a lil of this and that all from the perdomo line... but to say the least the Lot 23 maduro is a very nice and underrated smoke... Smooth creamy, coco, with hints a vanilla....and a nice lil kick and hint of spice to round it all up... This is definitely box worthy but I would rest them a month or two if time and room allow. Also, your burn issues are probably because your humidor is not at a consistent 63% 65%.... 70% may be a lil much......... get the beads or the puck, its the best.... scrap everything else homies....

Happy smoking.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s funny because I smoked a lot 23 maduro the other day. I got a sampler pack from cigars international that had a lil of this and that all from the perdomo line&#8230; but to say the least the Lot 23 maduro is a very nice and underrated smoke&#8230; Smooth creamy, coco, with hints a vanilla&#8230;.and a nice lil kick and hint of spice to round it all up&#8230; This is definitely box worthy but I would rest them a month or two if time and room allow. Also, your burn issues are probably because your humidor is not at a consistent 63% 65%&#8230;. 70% may be a lil much&#8230;&#8230;&#8230; get the beads or the puck, its the best&#8230;. scrap everything else homies&#8230;.</p>
<p>Happy smoking&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ern1911</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2009/10/25/perdomo-lot-23-maduro-twitter-review/#comment-84514</link>
		<dc:creator>Ern1911</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 23:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=5779#comment-84514</guid>
		<description>I like the Perdomo Lot 23 very much!   Your review was pretty much the same experience I had.  All 5 of my samplers burned the same way, very consistent in flavor and construction.  I I did not notice any problems with burn line going uneven though.  Great smoke for me!  Good review guys!  You helped confirm things I experienced with PL23.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the Perdomo Lot 23 very much!   Your review was pretty much the same experience I had.  All 5 of my samplers burned the same way, very consistent in flavor and construction.  I I did not notice any problems with burn line going uneven though.  Great smoke for me!  Good review guys!  You helped confirm things I experienced with PL23.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveC</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2009/10/25/perdomo-lot-23-maduro-twitter-review/#comment-84492</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 17:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=5779#comment-84492</guid>
		<description>Awesome review! Glad to see you guys ran with this idea!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome review! Glad to see you guys ran with this idea!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon W.</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2009/10/25/perdomo-lot-23-maduro-twitter-review/#comment-84490</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 17:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=5779#comment-84490</guid>
		<description>I dislike the Perdomo Lot 23&#039;s a lot...first time I had one it tasted like straight grass and hay and I wanted to throw up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dislike the Perdomo Lot 23&#8242;s a lot&#8230;first time I had one it tasted like straight grass and hay and I wanted to throw up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.003 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 370/371 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.stogiereview.com @ 2012-02-09 14:42:16 -->
