<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 601 Black Label (Short Ashes)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stogiereview.com/2009/06/06/601-black-label-short-ashes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2009/06/06/601-black-label-short-ashes/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=601-black-label-short-ashes</link>
	<description>Cigar reviews with a video twist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:32:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2009/06/06/601-black-label-short-ashes/#comment-104040</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2010 12:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=4315#comment-104040</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the 601 black review.  I am a huge fan of the 601 Reds and have tried the Blues and Greens as well.  I actually haven&#039;t tried the Black yet because I thought it would be too mild.  I bought two black Rabitos at my local B&amp;M for $4.50 each - a discontinued item.  Looks like I will be going back to get more now.

I also appreciate your description of the flavor as &quot;Rich&quot;.  When I review a cigar, it is hard sometimes coming up with actual flavors, but seems easier to come up with attributes like Tangy, Smooth, Rich, etc., which last time I checked weren&#039;t actual flavors.

I have a large collection (+800)  and am aging 95% past 15 months before lighting up.  Just curious on your take on aging.t</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the 601 black review.  I am a huge fan of the 601 Reds and have tried the Blues and Greens as well.  I actually haven&#8217;t tried the Black yet because I thought it would be too mild.  I bought two black Rabitos at my local B&amp;M for $4.50 each &#8211; a discontinued item.  Looks like I will be going back to get more now.</p>
<p>I also appreciate your description of the flavor as &#8220;Rich&#8221;.  When I review a cigar, it is hard sometimes coming up with actual flavors, but seems easier to come up with attributes like Tangy, Smooth, Rich, etc., which last time I checked weren&#8217;t actual flavors.</p>
<p>I have a large collection (+800)  and am aging 95% past 15 months before lighting up.  Just curious on your take on aging.t</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dk_fxn</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2009/06/06/601-black-label-short-ashes/#comment-94795</link>
		<dc:creator>dk_fxn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 16:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=4315#comment-94795</guid>
		<description>This review just inspired me to smoke one of these.  Thanks Walt!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This review just inspired me to smoke one of these.  Thanks Walt!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Espinosa y Ortega 601 Black Label Robusto &#8211; The Connecticut files, part 1 &#171; Cigar Review Rag</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2009/06/06/601-black-label-short-ashes/#comment-88963</link>
		<dc:creator>Espinosa y Ortega 601 Black Label Robusto &#8211; The Connecticut files, part 1 &#171; Cigar Review Rag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 23:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=4315#comment-88963</guid>
		<description>[...] opinions, mostly positive, on the 601 Black brand from Stogie Review, Cigar Inspector, The Perfect Draw and Cigar [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] opinions, mostly positive, on the 601 Black brand from Stogie Review, Cigar Inspector, The Perfect Draw and Cigar [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walt</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2009/06/06/601-black-label-short-ashes/#comment-73468</link>
		<dc:creator>Walt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 02:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=4315#comment-73468</guid>
		<description>Greg,
Yeah, I guess &quot;holding my attention&quot; was probably not the best way to describe it while multi-tasking. Some cigars just seem to smoke better than others while I work on other things, in this case I always knew it was there and it didn&#039;t slip away from me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg,<br />
Yeah, I guess &#8220;holding my attention&#8221; was probably not the best way to describe it while multi-tasking. Some cigars just seem to smoke better than others while I work on other things, in this case I always knew it was there and it didn&#8217;t slip away from me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greg</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2009/06/06/601-black-label-short-ashes/#comment-73467</link>
		<dc:creator>greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 02:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=4315#comment-73467</guid>
		<description>Walt, I&#039;ve been lurking and watching alot of your reviews.  Great stuff.  But you crack me up- Twitter, editing earlier video, taking care of dog etc. and still &quot;...this cigar has really held my attention&quot; hah!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walt, I&#8217;ve been lurking and watching alot of your reviews.  Great stuff.  But you crack me up- Twitter, editing earlier video, taking care of dog etc. and still &#8220;&#8230;this cigar has really held my attention&#8221; hah!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2009/06/06/601-black-label-short-ashes/#comment-73447</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 16:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=4315#comment-73447</guid>
		<description>Great review, also liked the personal chit chat mixed in. Funny dog story!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great review, also liked the personal chit chat mixed in. Funny dog story!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Hanifan</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2009/06/06/601-black-label-short-ashes/#comment-73365</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Hanifan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 08:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=4315#comment-73365</guid>
		<description>good review Walt.  I like the Black quite a bit.  Really enjoy all of the 601 cigars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good review Walt.  I like the Black quite a bit.  Really enjoy all of the 601 cigars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 382/382 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.stogiereview.com @ 2012-02-09 11:41:09 -->
