<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Camacho Connecticut (First Impressions)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stogiereview.com/2009/06/04/camacho-connecticut-first-impressions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2009/06/04/camacho-connecticut-first-impressions/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=camacho-connecticut-first-impressions</link>
	<description>Cigar reviews with a video twist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:43:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2009/06/04/camacho-connecticut-first-impressions/#comment-80168</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 13:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=4293#comment-80168</guid>
		<description>I am a Mild/ Mild-Med kinda guy. I live for creamy woody. I am no expert, but as with wine, i know what i like. I don&#039;t mind a slow start but geeesss  Walt was right. Slow start and  never really  brought home the  flavor. BUT  there was plenty of bite and harshness  if you i didn&#039;t  really really nurse this stick.  I was very disapponited  for a $7 cigar . .  not worth a second look for me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a Mild/ Mild-Med kinda guy. I live for creamy woody. I am no expert, but as with wine, i know what i like. I don&#8217;t mind a slow start but geeesss  Walt was right. Slow start and  never really  brought home the  flavor. BUT  there was plenty of bite and harshness  if you i didn&#8217;t  really really nurse this stick.  I was very disapponited  for a $7 cigar . .  not worth a second look for me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bud</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2009/06/04/camacho-connecticut-first-impressions/#comment-73273</link>
		<dc:creator>Bud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 15:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=4293#comment-73273</guid>
		<description>Walt and Jerry,
I had another one of these in the monarca size.  All I can say is what a difference.  I though it was great, definitely one of the better Connecticut wrapped cigars that I have had.  The local B&amp;M owner tells me not to write off the 11/18 size, as the one he gave me  was from the rep and that might have something to do with the way it smoked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walt and Jerry,<br />
I had another one of these in the monarca size.  All I can say is what a difference.  I though it was great, definitely one of the better Connecticut wrapped cigars that I have had.  The local B&amp;M owner tells me not to write off the 11/18 size, as the one he gave me  was from the rep and that might have something to do with the way it smoked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew T</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2009/06/04/camacho-connecticut-first-impressions/#comment-73249</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 03:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=4293#comment-73249</guid>
		<description>Great review!!!  I like that both you and Jerry reviewed the same cigar.  It was interesting to see the differences between your reviews!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great review!!!  I like that both you and Jerry reviewed the same cigar.  It was interesting to see the differences between your reviews!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Mike and Guy Experience Episode 2 &#124; Mike In West Virginia</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2009/06/04/camacho-connecticut-first-impressions/#comment-73229</link>
		<dc:creator>The Mike and Guy Experience Episode 2 &#124; Mike In West Virginia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 19:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=4293#comment-73229</guid>
		<description>[...] Walt @ StogieReview Camacho Connecticut [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Walt @ StogieReview Camacho Connecticut [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bud</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2009/06/04/camacho-connecticut-first-impressions/#comment-73221</link>
		<dc:creator>Bud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 13:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=4293#comment-73221</guid>
		<description>Jerry,
I wasn&#039;t totally disagreeing with you.  I liked it more then Walt appears too, I just don&#039;t think that it was stellar.  I&#039;m going to try a different sizes because I believe it is going to make a difference in how I feel about this stick.  If the first half of the cigar I had tasted like the second half I would have agreed more with you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jerry,<br />
I wasn&#8217;t totally disagreeing with you.  I liked it more then Walt appears too, I just don&#8217;t think that it was stellar.  I&#8217;m going to try a different sizes because I believe it is going to make a difference in how I feel about this stick.  If the first half of the cigar I had tasted like the second half I would have agreed more with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott heiser</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2009/06/04/camacho-connecticut-first-impressions/#comment-73192</link>
		<dc:creator>scott heiser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 02:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=4293#comment-73192</guid>
		<description>Hey Barry, at least you&#039;ll get hate comments LOL.. I&#039;m lucky if I get comments at all over here. I liked Walt&#039;s review very much, but I gotta get my hands on one to try shortly.
Scott-www.cigarchoice.net</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Barry, at least you&#8217;ll get hate comments LOL.. I&#8217;m lucky if I get comments at all over here. I liked Walt&#8217;s review very much, but I gotta get my hands on one to try shortly.<br />
Scott-www.cigarchoice.net</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walt</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2009/06/04/camacho-connecticut-first-impressions/#comment-73191</link>
		<dc:creator>Walt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 01:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=4293#comment-73191</guid>
		<description>Jerry,
I think that you had a great idea in posting both videos. It was definitely interesting to see the two different perspectives on this one.

I think your review of the MX3 was spot on, its a killer cigar. After feeling the same way about that cigar as you did, I really expected to fall in love with this one.

-Walt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jerry,<br />
I think that you had a great idea in posting both videos. It was definitely interesting to see the two different perspectives on this one.</p>
<p>I think your review of the MX3 was spot on, its a killer cigar. After feeling the same way about that cigar as you did, I really expected to fall in love with this one.</p>
<p>-Walt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.104 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 382/382 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.stogiereview.com @ 2012-02-09 15:03:59 -->
