<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tatuaje Black Robusto</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stogiereview.com/2009/03/18/tatuaje-black-robusto/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2009/03/18/tatuaje-black-robusto/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=tatuaje-black-robusto</link>
	<description>Cigar reviews with a video twist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:52:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: OlivaSerieV</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2009/03/18/tatuaje-black-robusto/#comment-68037</link>
		<dc:creator>OlivaSerieV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=3492#comment-68037</guid>
		<description>Nice review... When I asked Pete about the Jars they said never again will they release cigars that way again as it was a huge PIA. That may not doom the blacks from wacky distribution but Jars is definitely out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice review&#8230; When I asked Pete about the Jars they said never again will they release cigars that way again as it was a huge PIA. That may not doom the blacks from wacky distribution but Jars is definitely out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saturday Smokin&#8217; Summary - 3/21/09 &#187; Cigar Command</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2009/03/18/tatuaje-black-robusto/#comment-67823</link>
		<dc:creator>Saturday Smokin&#8217; Summary - 3/21/09 &#187; Cigar Command</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 16:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=3492#comment-67823</guid>
		<description>[...] Tatuaje Black Robusto - Stogie Review [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tatuaje Black Robusto &#8211; Stogie Review [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Hewitt</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2009/03/18/tatuaje-black-robusto/#comment-67751</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Hewitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 23:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=3492#comment-67751</guid>
		<description>Thanks guys. (And nice review Stan!)

Tommyn45,
I&#039;ll try to keep you guys posted if I hear any details about new Tatuaje Blacks in circulation. It&#039;s bound to happen sooner than later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks guys. (And nice review Stan!)</p>
<p>Tommyn45,<br />
I&#8217;ll try to keep you guys posted if I hear any details about new Tatuaje Blacks in circulation. It&#8217;s bound to happen sooner than later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dk_fxn</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2009/03/18/tatuaje-black-robusto/#comment-67703</link>
		<dc:creator>dk_fxn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 03:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=3492#comment-67703</guid>
		<description>two of these are in the humi and I can&#039;t wait to try &#039;em!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>two of these are in the humi and I can&#8217;t wait to try &#8216;em!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommyn45</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2009/03/18/tatuaje-black-robusto/#comment-67695</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommyn45</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 01:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=3492#comment-67695</guid>
		<description>Another great review.  I would like to try one of these - sounds like an interesting smoke.

I hope they start putting some more on the shelves!  Keep us posted if you hear anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another great review.  I would like to try one of these &#8211; sounds like an interesting smoke.</p>
<p>I hope they start putting some more on the shelves!  Keep us posted if you hear anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dinhilion</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2009/03/18/tatuaje-black-robusto/#comment-67684</link>
		<dc:creator>Dinhilion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 21:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=3492#comment-67684</guid>
		<description>NICE REVIEW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NICE REVIEW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan aka SoCal32</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2009/03/18/tatuaje-black-robusto/#comment-67681</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan aka SoCal32</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=3492#comment-67681</guid>
		<description>Nice review Brian. Funny thing is I  did a review on the forums earlier of the Casa Royale (robusto). It supposedly shares the wrapper (actually binder) with the tat black. Same flavors as expected, but not as much kick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice review Brian. Funny thing is I  did a review on the forums earlier of the Casa Royale (robusto). It supposedly shares the wrapper (actually binder) with the tat black. Same flavors as expected, but not as much kick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.004 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 381/382 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.stogiereview.com @ 2012-02-09 09:22:34 -->
