<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Liga Privada No. 9 (Guest Review)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stogiereview.com/2009/01/29/liga-privada-no-9-guest-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2009/01/29/liga-privada-no-9-guest-review/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=liga-privada-no-9-guest-review</link>
	<description>Cigar reviews with a video twist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:32:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2009/01/29/liga-privada-no-9-guest-review/#comment-181820</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 01:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=2940#comment-181820</guid>
		<description>Agree, it&#039;s a powerhouse cigar.  You&#039;ll certainly feel the kick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree, it&#8217;s a powerhouse cigar.  You&#8217;ll certainly feel the kick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cody</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2009/01/29/liga-privada-no-9-guest-review/#comment-161580</link>
		<dc:creator>Cody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 23:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=2940#comment-161580</guid>
		<description>just got a shipment of these bad boys in after having found them in Chicago for the first time ever months ago. This cigar is dangerous as all my other cigars pale in comparison. I have a humidor fully stocked with vegas 5 maduros, rockey patels, and many other awesome ones however since my first rendezvous with a Liga Privada months ago they have not hit the spot. These cigars are rather pricey, but you will not find a better cigar in all the world!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just got a shipment of these bad boys in after having found them in Chicago for the first time ever months ago. This cigar is dangerous as all my other cigars pale in comparison. I have a humidor fully stocked with vegas 5 maduros, rockey patels, and many other awesome ones however since my first rendezvous with a Liga Privada months ago they have not hit the spot. These cigars are rather pricey, but you will not find a better cigar in all the world!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2009/01/29/liga-privada-no-9-guest-review/#comment-96188</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 21:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=2940#comment-96188</guid>
		<description>Great review.

I have yet to try the Belicoso but I really enjoyed the Liga Privada No. 9 Corona Doble. Really well constructed and it didn&#039;t over power me. The taste was really good with some robust flavors of front and a really smooth creamy finish. You can check out my review at:

http://wp.me/pSZbU-9F</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great review.</p>
<p>I have yet to try the Belicoso but I really enjoyed the Liga Privada No. 9 Corona Doble. Really well constructed and it didn&#8217;t over power me. The taste was really good with some robust flavors of front and a really smooth creamy finish. You can check out my review at:</p>
<p><a href="http://wp.me/pSZbU-9F" rel="nofollow">http://wp.me/pSZbU-9F</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2009/01/29/liga-privada-no-9-guest-review/#comment-94937</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 22:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=2940#comment-94937</guid>
		<description>Great cigar!  Now on my second box.  I oredered some for my wedding to put at the bar.  I would deffinately reccomend this cigar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great cigar!  Now on my second box.  I oredered some for my wedding to put at the bar.  I would deffinately reccomend this cigar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2009/01/29/liga-privada-no-9-guest-review/#comment-94684</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 19:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=2940#comment-94684</guid>
		<description>I thought these were amazing after the first one. Then on the second I realized there was some inconsistency and a tight draw. After several of these I noticed that the robusto and the belicoso taste completely different and the draw was too tight on five out of seven of these. Earthy flavors and heavy smoke were present on the belicoso and not on the robusto. I let a few rest in the humidor for weeks and still had the same issues. 
Not a bad cigar but for $10 bucks I&#039;d expect way more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought these were amazing after the first one. Then on the second I realized there was some inconsistency and a tight draw. After several of these I noticed that the robusto and the belicoso taste completely different and the draw was too tight on five out of seven of these. Earthy flavors and heavy smoke were present on the belicoso and not on the robusto. I let a few rest in the humidor for weeks and still had the same issues.<br />
Not a bad cigar but for $10 bucks I&#8217;d expect way more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JDStarcz</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2009/01/29/liga-privada-no-9-guest-review/#comment-87969</link>
		<dc:creator>JDStarcz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 03:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=2940#comment-87969</guid>
		<description>Im surprised how many people like this cigar. I thought it was good enough to smoke again but not great enough to keep around in regular stock. Starts out good but mellows out after the first third. Worth a try. Just not for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im surprised how many people like this cigar. I thought it was good enough to smoke again but not great enough to keep around in regular stock. Starts out good but mellows out after the first third. Worth a try. Just not for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ElJaun13</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2009/01/29/liga-privada-no-9-guest-review/#comment-87704</link>
		<dc:creator>ElJaun13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=2940#comment-87704</guid>
		<description>I had these cigars over the weekend on a Golf Trip w/ the guys to Orlando, FL. I loved the, burn, flavor but most of all the after taste.... there was none! 

Nice flavor and smooth, it doesn&#039;t slap your tounge around or gives you at day feel as if you have a sock on your tounge either.

I will most definetly purchase this cigar time and time again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had these cigars over the weekend on a Golf Trip w/ the guys to Orlando, FL. I loved the, burn, flavor but most of all the after taste&#8230;. there was none! </p>
<p>Nice flavor and smooth, it doesn&#8217;t slap your tounge around or gives you at day feel as if you have a sock on your tounge either.</p>
<p>I will most definetly purchase this cigar time and time again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 381/382 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.stogiereview.com @ 2012-02-09 12:39:58 -->
