<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Your Questions, My Answers (YQMA) Episode 39</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/10/20/your-questions-my-answers-yqma-episode-39/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/10/20/your-questions-my-answers-yqma-episode-39/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=your-questions-my-answers-yqma-episode-39</link>
	<description>Cigar reviews with a video twist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:11:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian Hewitt</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/10/20/your-questions-my-answers-yqma-episode-39/#comment-57694</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Hewitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 16:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=1470#comment-57694</guid>
		<description>Thanks guys, glad you enjoyed the show. And thanks for all the great feedback!

Rob, if someone offers up 3+ million for SR, I&#039;ll gladly sit chain smoke swishers and white owls as penance for totally taking the money and running. LOL (Don&#039;t worry, it isn&#039;t gonna happen. And with each day that passes our sweat equity pushes that figure ever higher!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks guys, glad you enjoyed the show. And thanks for all the great feedback!</p>
<p>Rob, if someone offers up 3+ million for SR, I&#8217;ll gladly sit chain smoke swishers and white owls as penance for totally taking the money and running. LOL (Don&#8217;t worry, it isn&#8217;t gonna happen. And with each day that passes our sweat equity pushes that figure ever higher!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linus Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/10/20/your-questions-my-answers-yqma-episode-39/#comment-57624</link>
		<dc:creator>Linus Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 15:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=1470#comment-57624</guid>
		<description>Walt/Brian,

I just listened to your piece on the cigar forums being rolled into one and do have to agree with Brian that if this had been someone, say a FOG, who bought the forums it&#039;d probably go over better. Granted, from a business point of view it looks good but the reality is that if the number of eyeballs looking at ads drops, then it&#039;s a failure. And when we&#039;re talking about community-based forums where there is a kinship created, as is evident on pretty much all these forums, an outsider buying it, one that hasn&#039;t even participated on any other forum, tends not to go over well.

I&#039;ve gone through this similar kind of activity elsewhere and the end result was a loss of about 60-80% of the membership, especially when mods left. There is no fault at lie at the feet of the original owners. Sometimes, when you&#039;ve run a site for an extended period of time it may be time to move on. And certainly you can be a new owner who&#039;s never been part of a community but if this is to be done for business reasons, then be professional about it. And I think that&#039;s what&#039;s going to cause the biggest problem for the new site. My IT background has taught me the importance of &quot;full disclosure&quot; and how that is often far better an attitude to take than trying to hide something, especially when you&#039;re an unknown. People better appreciate it. I have noticed a sense of &quot;don&#039;t ask me questions as I won&#039;t answer anything that might challenge me&quot;. No matter how challenging or abrasive a question may be, IMO, I think it&#039;s better to answer it (granted, take a breath first) than to brush people off.  

As for the small manufacturers, I wouldn&#039;t be surprised to see them populate on what were the smaller forums and utilize that as a way to advertise their products. This will, in turn, be a boon for the smaller forums as they will grow with that and the cycle will continue. I suspect that the new conglomarate that will be under Puff.com will become rather stagnate in regards to membership and will see smaller growth than previous cycles for at least 2-03 years. 

As for the name, I wouldn&#039;t be surprised to hear of other forums -- cigarettes, pipes, etc. -- being purchased and put under the one name. It&#039;s interesting that he didn&#039;t buy smoke.com, which is available for sale. ;) For the cigar community as a whole, I think there will be a benefit. It&#039;s not because everyone will visit the new site but rather will go to the smaller sites, almost like the small, local B&amp;M cigar store that many of us support near us. 

Anyways, that&#039;s my take. Not much can be done at this point since they are done deals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walt/Brian,</p>
<p>I just listened to your piece on the cigar forums being rolled into one and do have to agree with Brian that if this had been someone, say a FOG, who bought the forums it&#8217;d probably go over better. Granted, from a business point of view it looks good but the reality is that if the number of eyeballs looking at ads drops, then it&#8217;s a failure. And when we&#8217;re talking about community-based forums where there is a kinship created, as is evident on pretty much all these forums, an outsider buying it, one that hasn&#8217;t even participated on any other forum, tends not to go over well.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve gone through this similar kind of activity elsewhere and the end result was a loss of about 60-80% of the membership, especially when mods left. There is no fault at lie at the feet of the original owners. Sometimes, when you&#8217;ve run a site for an extended period of time it may be time to move on. And certainly you can be a new owner who&#8217;s never been part of a community but if this is to be done for business reasons, then be professional about it. And I think that&#8217;s what&#8217;s going to cause the biggest problem for the new site. My IT background has taught me the importance of &#8220;full disclosure&#8221; and how that is often far better an attitude to take than trying to hide something, especially when you&#8217;re an unknown. People better appreciate it. I have noticed a sense of &#8220;don&#8217;t ask me questions as I won&#8217;t answer anything that might challenge me&#8221;. No matter how challenging or abrasive a question may be, IMO, I think it&#8217;s better to answer it (granted, take a breath first) than to brush people off.  </p>
<p>As for the small manufacturers, I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised to see them populate on what were the smaller forums and utilize that as a way to advertise their products. This will, in turn, be a boon for the smaller forums as they will grow with that and the cycle will continue. I suspect that the new conglomarate that will be under Puff.com will become rather stagnate in regards to membership and will see smaller growth than previous cycles for at least 2-03 years. </p>
<p>As for the name, I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised to hear of other forums &#8212; cigarettes, pipes, etc. &#8212; being purchased and put under the one name. It&#8217;s interesting that he didn&#8217;t buy smoke.com, which is available for sale. <img src='http://www.stogiereview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  For the cigar community as a whole, I think there will be a benefit. It&#8217;s not because everyone will visit the new site but rather will go to the smaller sites, almost like the small, local B&amp;M cigar store that many of us support near us. </p>
<p>Anyways, that&#8217;s my take. Not much can be done at this point since they are done deals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tony</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/10/20/your-questions-my-answers-yqma-episode-39/#comment-57420</link>
		<dc:creator>tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=1470#comment-57420</guid>
		<description>Walt/Brian
  In regards to question#3 this issue can be checked by smoking 2 cigars back to back...if it is a shock to the palate then the 2nd smoke will be smooth the whole time and not harsh in the begining right? And I am sure that puffing while lighting is not gonna &quot;burn a tunnel through the cigar&quot;, but it very well might make the 1st inch taste more strong or bitter...do a hard puff puff bit o&#039; action on a cheap cigar while lighting it and then cut it open after it&#039;s lit to see if the tobacco is charred, if it is then you know that the flame is causing excessive heat and most likely the cause of bad taste. I also reserve the right to be wrong!!! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walt/Brian<br />
  In regards to question#3 this issue can be checked by smoking 2 cigars back to back&#8230;if it is a shock to the palate then the 2nd smoke will be smooth the whole time and not harsh in the begining right? And I am sure that puffing while lighting is not gonna &#8220;burn a tunnel through the cigar&#8221;, but it very well might make the 1st inch taste more strong or bitter&#8230;do a hard puff puff bit o&#8217; action on a cheap cigar while lighting it and then cut it open after it&#8217;s lit to see if the tobacco is charred, if it is then you know that the flame is causing excessive heat and most likely the cause of bad taste. I also reserve the right to be wrong!!! <img src='http://www.stogiereview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/10/20/your-questions-my-answers-yqma-episode-39/#comment-57309</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 04:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=1470#comment-57309</guid>
		<description>Hey Chris, I live in Toronto, Canada and I always buy from showMeYourAsh.com website located in Texas. Shipping is really good and they will package it in a way that dont hit any duties. Ask for Raymond.

Cheers,
Alex</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Chris, I live in Toronto, Canada and I always buy from showMeYourAsh.com website located in Texas. Shipping is really good and they will package it in a way that dont hit any duties. Ask for Raymond.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Alex</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RGianelli</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/10/20/your-questions-my-answers-yqma-episode-39/#comment-57289</link>
		<dc:creator>RGianelli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 21:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=1470#comment-57289</guid>
		<description>Great discusion on the buyout....though I want to hope for the best..I just DO NOT have a good vibe from the new owner...Thanks again for all of your efforts..and if you ever decide to sell SR..I will hunt you down and force you to smoke White Owls ans Swisher Sweets..LOL
Rob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great discusion on the buyout&#8230;.though I want to hope for the best..I just DO NOT have a good vibe from the new owner&#8230;Thanks again for all of your efforts..and if you ever decide to sell SR..I will hunt you down and force you to smoke White Owls ans Swisher Sweets..LOL<br />
Rob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Tom half of Ed &#38; Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/10/20/your-questions-my-answers-yqma-episode-39/#comment-57283</link>
		<dc:creator>The Tom half of Ed &#38; Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 19:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=1470#comment-57283</guid>
		<description>As always, great episode guys. 

As for the off topic banter about the buyout... I pretty much have the same opinion as the both of you. Although my main pet peeve is &quot;Puff.com.&quot; I mean, C&#039;mon! Puff.com?! That&#039;s a horrible name in my opinion.

Thanks again for YQMA #39!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As always, great episode guys. </p>
<p>As for the off topic banter about the buyout&#8230; I pretty much have the same opinion as the both of you. Although my main pet peeve is &#8220;Puff.com.&#8221; I mean, C&#8217;mon! Puff.com?! That&#8217;s a horrible name in my opinion.</p>
<p>Thanks again for YQMA #39!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RGianelli</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/10/20/your-questions-my-answers-yqma-episode-39/#comment-57273</link>
		<dc:creator>RGianelli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=1470#comment-57273</guid>
		<description>Hey Walt &amp; Brian..I use the slow toasting method as well..but for a slightly different reason than just controlling the heat..I find that I get a much more even light on the cigar with this method..I always seemed to torch up one side of the cigar or the other when I used to light while puffing..Now I almost always have a perfect light..
Thanks guys..
Rob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Walt &amp; Brian..I use the slow toasting method as well..but for a slightly different reason than just controlling the heat..I find that I get a much more even light on the cigar with this method..I always seemed to torch up one side of the cigar or the other when I used to light while puffing..Now I almost always have a perfect light..<br />
Thanks guys..<br />
Rob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.051 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 389/390 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.stogiereview.com @ 2012-02-09 16:20:15 -->
