Comments on: Macanudo 1968 (Guest Review) http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/10/02/guest-review-macanudo-1968/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=guest-review-macanudo-1968 Cigar reviews with a video twist Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:42:37 +0000 hourly 1 By: TomsCigars » Blog Archive » Macanudo 1968 Video Cigar Review http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/10/02/guest-review-macanudo-1968/#comment-63853 TomsCigars » Blog Archive » Macanudo 1968 Video Cigar Review Sat, 17 Jan 2009 16:44:23 +0000 http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=1233#comment-63853 [...] we reviewed the Macanudo 1968. Don’t forget… All of our video reviews are featured on The Stogie Review! Don’t forget to check out what Brian and Jason thought of the Macanudo [...] [...] we reviewed the Macanudo 1968. Don’t forget… All of our video reviews are featured on The Stogie Review! Don’t forget to check out what Brian and Jason thought of the Macanudo [...]

]]> By: The Tom half of Ed & Tom http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/10/02/guest-review-macanudo-1968/#comment-56333 The Tom half of Ed & Tom Tue, 07 Oct 2008 00:18:33 +0000 http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=1233#comment-56333 Bud, Thanks man. It's a slow process. Some people are a natural at picking apart a smoke, but it's taking me a long time. It's still a work in progress. I'll definately stick around but try to control the chaos when there is more then the two of us. Bud,
Thanks man. It’s a slow process. Some people are a natural at picking apart a smoke, but it’s taking me a long time. It’s still a work in progress.

I’ll definately stick around but try to control the chaos when there is more then the two of us.

]]> By: Bud http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/10/02/guest-review-macanudo-1968/#comment-56166 Bud Sat, 04 Oct 2008 14:36:35 +0000 http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=1233#comment-56166 Tom, I think you underestimate the value of your input in these reviews. The review would not be the same if you step back and let just Ed and Anthony take over. Your second choice of trying to prevent everyone talking at once is a better idea. It's great to watch these reviews and see your pallet get more and more refined. Keep up the good work Tom, I think you underestimate the value of your input in these reviews. The review would not be the same if you step back and let just Ed and Anthony take over. Your second choice of trying to prevent everyone talking at once is a better idea. It’s great to watch these reviews and see your pallet get more and more refined.

Keep up the good work

]]> By: The Tom half of Ed & Tom http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/10/02/guest-review-macanudo-1968/#comment-56112 The Tom half of Ed & Tom Fri, 03 Oct 2008 20:42:08 +0000 http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=1233#comment-56112 Steve- I'll make sure Ed reads your post about it being medium! At first, I felt it was in the upper medium, but did become full bodied as time went on. I smoked a couple and didn't have draw problems though, and the smoke was plentiful on all of them. Maybe you had a bad stick? Anyhow, glad you enjoyed the review. -Tom Steve- I’ll make sure Ed reads your post about it being medium! At first, I felt it was in the upper medium, but did become full bodied as time went on. I smoked a couple and didn’t have draw problems though, and the smoke was plentiful on all of them. Maybe you had a bad stick?

Anyhow, glad you enjoyed the review.
-Tom

]]> By: Steve (Ratters) http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/10/02/guest-review-macanudo-1968/#comment-56027 Steve (Ratters) Fri, 03 Oct 2008 01:19:37 +0000 http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=1233#comment-56027 Great vid as always. I decided to smoke one with you guys while I watched, I must say I don't care for it as much as you guys did. It is fuller bodied than other Macanudos but really sort of a medium smoke. Draw was on the tight side and smoke production was pretty limited. The flavors were just not very appealing to me. Heavy on the sweetness but without any kick to make it interesting. Looking forward to the Black Dragon review. :) Great vid as always. I decided to smoke one with you guys while I watched, I must say I don’t care for it as much as you guys did. It is fuller bodied than other Macanudos but really sort of a medium smoke. Draw was on the tight side and smoke production was pretty limited. The flavors were just not very appealing to me. Heavy on the sweetness but without any kick to make it interesting. Looking forward to the Black Dragon review. :)

]]> By: The Tom half of Ed & Tom http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/10/02/guest-review-macanudo-1968/#comment-56019 The Tom half of Ed & Tom Thu, 02 Oct 2008 23:46:34 +0000 http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=1233#comment-56019 Thanks all for checking out the review! Nate - For a Macanudo, I easily think it's their best one. Thomas - I think it's worth a try. Lisa - Strangly enough... Whenever the camera rolls, we tend to cut down on cursing and try to act somewhat normal. You think Anthony is amusing on camera? That's nothing compared to the 'usual' Anthony. The guy is a thousand laughs. If your in the area, stop on by for a gar! Marcian - Macanudo's got me started in the cigar smoking hobby. But I quickly grew bored of them. Gotta give Mac some props for finally releasing something fuller bodied. And as always, I agree - Ed is the F'in man! Tony - I see your point. The last time he was on, Ed and I tended to inturrupt him without realizing it. I think the next time Anthony is in a review, I'm going to let him and Ed take over, or at least let everyone have their say without being stepped on. Both of them have far more advanced pallets then mine. Keep on puffin' MF'ers! ;-) Thanks all for checking out the review!

Nate – For a Macanudo, I easily think it’s their best one.

Thomas – I think it’s worth a try.

Lisa – Strangly enough… Whenever the camera rolls, we tend to cut down on cursing and try to act somewhat normal. You think Anthony is amusing on camera? That’s nothing compared to the ‘usual’ Anthony. The guy is a thousand laughs. If your in the area, stop on by for a gar!

Marcian – Macanudo’s got me started in the cigar smoking hobby. But I quickly grew bored of them. Gotta give Mac some props for finally releasing something fuller bodied. And as always, I agree – Ed is the F’in man!

Tony – I see your point. The last time he was on, Ed and I tended to inturrupt him without realizing it. I think the next time Anthony is in a review, I’m going to let him and Ed take over, or at least let everyone have their say without being stepped on. Both of them have far more advanced pallets then mine.

Keep on puffin’ MF’ers! ;-)

]]> By: tony http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/10/02/guest-review-macanudo-1968/#comment-56017 tony Thu, 02 Oct 2008 22:54:22 +0000 http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=1233#comment-56017 I think that Anthony would be best used as a small segment of the Tom & Ed show.... Maybe just get his overall view of the cigar, otherwise it seems that too many people talk at one time....This review had a nice balance of Tom, Ed, and Anthony. The out-takes were good, always a nice addition to any vid review! Keep puffing MF's!!!!!!!! I think that Anthony would be best used as a small segment of the Tom & Ed show…. Maybe just get his overall view of the cigar, otherwise it seems that too many people talk at one time….This review had a nice balance of Tom, Ed, and Anthony. The out-takes were good, always a nice addition to any vid review!

Keep puffing MF’s!!!!!!!!

]]>