<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Perdomo Patriarch Corojo Torpedo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/08/27/perdomo-patriarch-corojo-torpedo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/08/27/perdomo-patriarch-corojo-torpedo/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=perdomo-patriarch-corojo-torpedo</link>
	<description>Cigar reviews with a video twist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:32:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian Hewitt</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/08/27/perdomo-patriarch-corojo-torpedo/#comment-124235</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Hewitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 07:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=719#comment-124235</guid>
		<description>Zach,

You make a good point, and while I don&#039;t recall all the details, I don&#039;t think the cigar actually came from IPCPR. It was passed given to one rep from another at an event some time later. But it was a sample a rep carried around. Ordinarily I give a stick like this some time in the humidor before a review, but I may not have in this case. (I don&#039;t remember, it was years ago.) If so, yeah, the comments on the construction may not have been completely fair. On the other hand, my verdict was positive, I still like them and I have smoked more since then, so there&#039;s that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zach,</p>
<p>You make a good point, and while I don&#8217;t recall all the details, I don&#8217;t think the cigar actually came from IPCPR. It was passed given to one rep from another at an event some time later. But it was a sample a rep carried around. Ordinarily I give a stick like this some time in the humidor before a review, but I may not have in this case. (I don&#8217;t remember, it was years ago.) If so, yeah, the comments on the construction may not have been completely fair. On the other hand, my verdict was positive, I still like them and I have smoked more since then, so there&#8217;s that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach Scardino</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/08/27/perdomo-patriarch-corojo-torpedo/#comment-123800</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach Scardino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 15:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=719#comment-123800</guid>
		<description>The cigar was transported to a trade show, bustled around, handed out at said trade show, carried around in a pocket for a while, handed to another person, and finally reviewed. If a cigar demonstrates solid construction after all of that I would be impressed. I have reviewed cigars before that had been pocketed and changed hands two or three times. I try to make a point of not counting any &#039;construction issues&#039; against it too heavily as that cigar has been though quite a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The cigar was transported to a trade show, bustled around, handed out at said trade show, carried around in a pocket for a while, handed to another person, and finally reviewed. If a cigar demonstrates solid construction after all of that I would be impressed. I have reviewed cigars before that had been pocketed and changed hands two or three times. I try to make a point of not counting any &#8216;construction issues&#8217; against it too heavily as that cigar has been though quite a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sal Monella</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/08/27/perdomo-patriarch-corojo-torpedo/#comment-93475</link>
		<dc:creator>Sal Monella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 19:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=719#comment-93475</guid>
		<description>I use to smoke the Habano series.  Unfortunately, they began canoeing more than a flotilla of Mohawk Indians.  I believe Perdomo has a problem with bad rollers.  The only cigar from Perdomo I find constructed
well is the Silvios, expensive but a great stick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use to smoke the Habano series.  Unfortunately, they began canoeing more than a flotilla of Mohawk Indians.  I believe Perdomo has a problem with bad rollers.  The only cigar from Perdomo I find constructed<br />
well is the Silvios, expensive but a great stick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VicDamone</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/08/27/perdomo-patriarch-corojo-torpedo/#comment-87443</link>
		<dc:creator>VicDamone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 22:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=719#comment-87443</guid>
		<description>This cigar is the Bomb.... I have not tried the Camacho Corojo but based on what I&#039;ve read thus far, I might give it a shot... For those looking to purchase single sticks from a great online shop with free shipping, try Tampahumidor.com. They may not have the most extensive selection but i really like that the shipping is free and the send humi pillows with every purchase....

Happy Smoking....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This cigar is the Bomb&#8230;. I have not tried the Camacho Corojo but based on what I&#8217;ve read thus far, I might give it a shot&#8230; For those looking to purchase single sticks from a great online shop with free shipping, try Tampahumidor.com. They may not have the most extensive selection but i really like that the shipping is free and the send humi pillows with every purchase&#8230;.</p>
<p>Happy Smoking&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/08/27/perdomo-patriarch-corojo-torpedo/#comment-76242</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 02:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=719#comment-76242</guid>
		<description>This was a great smoke. Mine burned evenly, however required a relight about 2/3 thru. Solid taste. I do recommend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a great smoke. Mine burned evenly, however required a relight about 2/3 thru. Solid taste. I do recommend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/08/27/perdomo-patriarch-corojo-torpedo/#comment-62145</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 15:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=719#comment-62145</guid>
		<description>Forgot to add one thing The best part of the cigar or the &quot;Sweet Spot&quot; is right before you start hitting the last third making me think a Lonsdale or possibly a Churchill would be nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgot to add one thing The best part of the cigar or the &#8220;Sweet Spot&#8221; is right before you start hitting the last third making me think a Lonsdale or possibly a Churchill would be nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/08/27/perdomo-patriarch-corojo-torpedo/#comment-62142</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 14:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=719#comment-62142</guid>
		<description>I have a local B&amp;M that Has EVERYTHING the only cigar I wish to try they don&#039;t have is the Tatuaje Black. But other than that they have everything in almost all vitolas Needless to say its a HUGE humidor. 

So as I was getting some of my usual&#039;s (Tat Reds, and Camancho Corojo&#039;s)  I decided to try a new Corojo and picked up a Patriarch in a Carona size. It has a light Corojo wrapper it was VERY smooth and the review was pretty much the same. Uneven burn Slow burner holds almost 2 in ash although in the smaller ring it is less flaky and longer. I like cigars with foot bands as it keeps the foot nice and crisp. In all I found this to be an average cigar (I am no a huge Perdomo Fan so I  may be a bit biased) 

Personally I don&#039;t think I will be buying more I really like the Camancho Corojo&#039;s and being about the same price in my area (California) both brands are about the same price so I will stick with my Camancho Corojo&#039;s for now (I really think its due to the fact that the Camancho is all Corojo filler and I don&#039;t know if this is the same for the Perdomo. 

In all Its a good cigar but it wont become one of my new favorites but i bet it will be for some others. Personally I also think that it is overpriced for what it is it is the same price as the Camacho which is a Much higher quality cigar. a corona cost me 9 bucks and I think it should have been $6-$7 maybe even $8 but not $9 I think the Churchills should be about $10 or $11 and then the rest should follow the same price downgrade. (its all about the Perdomo Name that brings the price tag. IMO)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a local B&amp;M that Has EVERYTHING the only cigar I wish to try they don&#8217;t have is the Tatuaje Black. But other than that they have everything in almost all vitolas Needless to say its a HUGE humidor. </p>
<p>So as I was getting some of my usual&#8217;s (Tat Reds, and Camancho Corojo&#8217;s)  I decided to try a new Corojo and picked up a Patriarch in a Carona size. It has a light Corojo wrapper it was VERY smooth and the review was pretty much the same. Uneven burn Slow burner holds almost 2 in ash although in the smaller ring it is less flaky and longer. I like cigars with foot bands as it keeps the foot nice and crisp. In all I found this to be an average cigar (I am no a huge Perdomo Fan so I  may be a bit biased) </p>
<p>Personally I don&#8217;t think I will be buying more I really like the Camancho Corojo&#8217;s and being about the same price in my area (California) both brands are about the same price so I will stick with my Camancho Corojo&#8217;s for now (I really think its due to the fact that the Camancho is all Corojo filler and I don&#8217;t know if this is the same for the Perdomo. </p>
<p>In all Its a good cigar but it wont become one of my new favorites but i bet it will be for some others. Personally I also think that it is overpriced for what it is it is the same price as the Camacho which is a Much higher quality cigar. a corona cost me 9 bucks and I think it should have been $6-$7 maybe even $8 but not $9 I think the Churchills should be about $10 or $11 and then the rest should follow the same price downgrade. (its all about the Perdomo Name that brings the price tag. IMO)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.003 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 381/382 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.stogiereview.com @ 2012-02-09 13:26:36 -->
