<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Los Tabaqueros: A Handmade Documentary Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/06/29/los-tabaqueros-a-handmade-documentary-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/06/29/los-tabaqueros-a-handmade-documentary-review/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=los-tabaqueros-a-handmade-documentary-review</link>
	<description>Cigar reviews with a video twist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:11:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian Hewitt</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/06/29/los-tabaqueros-a-handmade-documentary-review/#comment-47033</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Hewitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 04:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=638#comment-47033</guid>
		<description>Yeah Tom, 
I was really surprised when it was over. But it&#039;s pretty good if you consider what it is, a short &lt;b&gt;favorable&lt;/b&gt; art house treatment of the cigar industry. When was the last time outsiders treated the cigar industry favorably? 

I was thinking maybe we should a send a copy of this to local politicians every time they start talking about bans, with a note saying: &quot;Look dummy. These are the people you&#039;re gonna put out of work!&quot; It&#039;s short enough that maybe they won&#039;t give it to a staffer to review for them. LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah Tom,<br />
I was really surprised when it was over. But it&#8217;s pretty good if you consider what it is, a short <b>favorable</b> art house treatment of the cigar industry. When was the last time outsiders treated the cigar industry favorably? </p>
<p>I was thinking maybe we should a send a copy of this to local politicians every time they start talking about bans, with a note saying: &#8220;Look dummy. These are the people you&#8217;re gonna put out of work!&#8221; It&#8217;s short enough that maybe they won&#8217;t give it to a staffer to review for them. LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/06/29/los-tabaqueros-a-handmade-documentary-review/#comment-47020</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 21:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=638#comment-47020</guid>
		<description>Wow 8 minutes is rediculous! But I&#039;m a sucker for cigar media, so I&#039;ll end up with this eventually. It sounds like it sits in the middle of the CAO and Fuente video&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow 8 minutes is rediculous! But I&#8217;m a sucker for cigar media, so I&#8217;ll end up with this eventually. It sounds like it sits in the middle of the CAO and Fuente video&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Hewitt</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/06/29/los-tabaqueros-a-handmade-documentary-review/#comment-46955</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Hewitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 19:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=638#comment-46955</guid>
		<description>LOL Patrick,
I think it&#039;s safe to say you&#039;ll only need one bag of popcorn. As I mentioned in the review, the actual feature video is only 8 minutes. (Actually, closer to 7 and a half, I timed it the second time I watched!) However, that being said, the special features content will keep you occupied a bit longer. I read, watched and listened to everything on the DVD (including bonus director interview and music tracks) in probably an hour or an hour and a half. And I mean everything. Most people probably won&#039;t read every glossary entry like I did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL Patrick,<br />
I think it&#8217;s safe to say you&#8217;ll only need one bag of popcorn. As I mentioned in the review, the actual feature video is only 8 minutes. (Actually, closer to 7 and a half, I timed it the second time I watched!) However, that being said, the special features content will keep you occupied a bit longer. I read, watched and listened to everything on the DVD (including bonus director interview and music tracks) in probably an hour or an hour and a half. And I mean everything. Most people probably won&#8217;t read every glossary entry like I did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/06/29/los-tabaqueros-a-handmade-documentary-review/#comment-46953</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 19:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=638#comment-46953</guid>
		<description>Brian,
do you have a viewing time on it?  I couldn&#039;t find one on its home page, and for 25 bucks I&#039;d like to know how many bags of popcorn to pop for this.  Thanks alot, and again, great work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian,<br />
do you have a viewing time on it?  I couldn&#8217;t find one on its home page, and for 25 bucks I&#8217;d like to know how many bags of popcorn to pop for this.  Thanks alot, and again, great work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.003 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 348/349 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.stogiereview.com @ 2012-02-09 16:47:33 -->
