<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Padilla Series 68 (Guest Review)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/06/26/guest-review-padilla-series-68/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/06/26/guest-review-padilla-series-68/</link>
	<description>Cigar reviews with a video twist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:58:41 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lucas</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/06/26/guest-review-padilla-series-68/#comment-69137</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 13:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=635#comment-69137</guid>
		<description>A friend and I smoked these last night (in the toro size, not robusto).  They were both spicy and more than a little harsh.  We both also had major construction problems.  The draw was good, but the burn was terribly uneven and required us to constantly pull the torch out to correct.  Overall I think we were both quite disappointed by this smoke.  If you are looking for a nice corojo, I would definitely recommend you go try the RP Olde World instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A friend and I smoked these last night (in the toro size, not robusto).  They were both spicy and more than a little harsh.  We both also had major construction problems.  The draw was good, but the burn was terribly uneven and required us to constantly pull the torch out to correct.  Overall I think we were both quite disappointed by this smoke.  If you are looking for a nice corojo, I would definitely recommend you go try the RP Olde World instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/06/26/guest-review-padilla-series-68/#comment-68622</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 05:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=635#comment-68622</guid>
		<description>Nate, I&#039;ve been smoking the same cigar while listening to your review (which was very good by the way). I&#039;m enjoying the cigar with a Stella Artois, only complaint is the burn issue. I live in Hawaii, maybe hummidy is an issue. Thanks for the great review.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nate, I&#8217;ve been smoking the same cigar while listening to your review (which was very good by the way). I&#8217;m enjoying the cigar with a Stella Artois, only complaint is the burn issue. I live in Hawaii, maybe hummidy is an issue. Thanks for the great review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy W</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/06/26/guest-review-padilla-series-68/#comment-65131</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 06:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=635#comment-65131</guid>
		<description>The Padilla serie 68 was a fabulous smoke really enjoayable. Unlit, it was one of the best smelling cigars I have encountered, a sweet maybe chocolaty smell - but then I haven&#039;t had chocolate in ten years so maybe I am a little over sensitive.  My Padilla burned perfectly with great ash.  Nathan is spot on in describing the incredible flavor. I have never developed this identification some have for describing spices and leather and such. But the flavor had a slight sweetness, a balance - awesome.  And the thing I really want from cigars -smoothness. I got busy for half an hour and it went out with about a third left.  When I relit,  it still was smooth with almost no bitterness.  The Padilla serie 68 is definitely one of my top ten cigars.  I hope you enjoy it as much a I did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Padilla serie 68 was a fabulous smoke really enjoayable. Unlit, it was one of the best smelling cigars I have encountered, a sweet maybe chocolaty smell &#8211; but then I haven&#8217;t had chocolate in ten years so maybe I am a little over sensitive.  My Padilla burned perfectly with great ash.  Nathan is spot on in describing the incredible flavor. I have never developed this identification some have for describing spices and leather and such. But the flavor had a slight sweetness, a balance &#8211; awesome.  And the thing I really want from cigars -smoothness. I got busy for half an hour and it went out with about a third left.  When I relit,  it still was smooth with almost no bitterness.  The Padilla serie 68 is definitely one of my top ten cigars.  I hope you enjoy it as much a I did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Padilla Series &#8216;68 Toro &#171; Matt&#8217;s Cigar Journal</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/06/26/guest-review-padilla-series-68/#comment-61615</link>
		<dc:creator>Padilla Series &#8216;68 Toro &#171; Matt&#8217;s Cigar Journal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 20:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=635#comment-61615</guid>
		<description>[...] Stogie Review has a video guest review of the Series &#8216;68 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Stogie Review has a video guest review of the Series &#8216;68 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonick</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/06/26/guest-review-padilla-series-68/#comment-51096</link>
		<dc:creator>sonick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 22:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=635#comment-51096</guid>
		<description>I absolutely love these sticks. I picked a box of the double-banded v. here in Phoenix, AZ. I haven&#039;t had any of the burn proglems whatsoever, but that could also be because it&#039;s so arid here in the desert. As soon as I take a stick out of the humidor, the race is on... you can dry a stick to a crisp in 24 hours tops. Anyhow, this is the first time I&#039;ve seen your reviews, and I think you do a great job. Very engaging. As a born &amp; bred midwest Illinois fellow, I REALLY miss the thunderclaps I was hearing in the background towards the end. 365 days of sunshine can actually get old, believe it or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I absolutely love these sticks. I picked a box of the double-banded v. here in Phoenix, AZ. I haven&#8217;t had any of the burn proglems whatsoever, but that could also be because it&#8217;s so arid here in the desert. As soon as I take a stick out of the humidor, the race is on&#8230; you can dry a stick to a crisp in 24 hours tops. Anyhow, this is the first time I&#8217;ve seen your reviews, and I think you do a great job. Very engaging. As a born &amp; bred midwest Illinois fellow, I REALLY miss the thunderclaps I was hearing in the background towards the end. 365 days of sunshine can actually get old, believe it or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave hanifan</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/06/26/guest-review-padilla-series-68/#comment-46851</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave hanifan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 06:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=635#comment-46851</guid>
		<description>Great review.  I am very curious about the Padilla cigars.  They sure get nice ratings.  I&#039;ve only smoked the Padilla Achilles and it&#039;s an awesome cigar.  This one is on my MUST smoke list :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great review.  I am very curious about the Padilla cigars.  They sure get nice ratings.  I&#8217;ve only smoked the Padilla Achilles and it&#8217;s an awesome cigar.  This one is on my MUST smoke list <img src='http://www.stogiereview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/06/26/guest-review-padilla-series-68/#comment-46827</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 17:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=635#comment-46827</guid>
		<description>Mr. B--

Not usually. Last night I was recording our PorchCast outside and it was humid enough to soak my papers, but the cigar burned perfectly even. 

Never really have noticed any major problems with the burn, even when I was down in Birmingham for a few years. I was in Charleston in March and had some minor problems..but that was outside by the pool =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. B&#8211;</p>
<p>Not usually. Last night I was recording our PorchCast outside and it was humid enough to soak my papers, but the cigar burned perfectly even. </p>
<p>Never really have noticed any major problems with the burn, even when I was down in Birmingham for a few years. I was in Charleston in March and had some minor problems..but that was outside by the pool =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
