<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Graycliff G2 (Guest Review)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/03/27/guest-review-13/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/03/27/guest-review-13/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=guest-review-13</link>
	<description>Cigar reviews with a video twist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:25:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: CDJ</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/03/27/guest-review-13/#comment-95747</link>
		<dc:creator>CDJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 20:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/03/27/2008/guest-review-13/#comment-95747</guid>
		<description>Found the stick fairly well constructed but tasteless.  Received it as a gift so it was worth the price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Found the stick fairly well constructed but tasteless.  Received it as a gift so it was worth the price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denversmoker</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/03/27/guest-review-13/#comment-95262</link>
		<dc:creator>Denversmoker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 17:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/03/27/2008/guest-review-13/#comment-95262</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had several of these.  I agree with the slight leathery taste and undertones of spice comments.  However, the emphasis is slight-for the most part I found very little flavor, bordering on none.  Perhaps I had a bad batch, but the wrapper tends to come loose at the cut very quickly.  Burn was even, draw was easy.  A good dog walker if you can find it at a good price.  It won&#039;t stop me from sampling other Graycliffs, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had several of these.  I agree with the slight leathery taste and undertones of spice comments.  However, the emphasis is slight-for the most part I found very little flavor, bordering on none.  Perhaps I had a bad batch, but the wrapper tends to come loose at the cut very quickly.  Burn was even, draw was easy.  A good dog walker if you can find it at a good price.  It won&#8217;t stop me from sampling other Graycliffs, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vito B</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/03/27/guest-review-13/#comment-95130</link>
		<dc:creator>Vito B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 21:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/03/27/2008/guest-review-13/#comment-95130</guid>
		<description>The Graycliff G2......The Conn. wrapper tasted like grass, the spice tasted sour, it burned like i was outside in the wind instead of my living room recliner. I&#039;m not one who likes or dislikes a stogie based on the price. This cigar did not, in any way, by any stretch of my imagination..... satisfy me. I hope you have better luck and your taste buds don&#039;t do what mine did....beg for mercy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Graycliff G2&#8230;&#8230;The Conn. wrapper tasted like grass, the spice tasted sour, it burned like i was outside in the wind instead of my living room recliner. I&#8217;m not one who likes or dislikes a stogie based on the price. This cigar did not, in any way, by any stretch of my imagination&#8230;.. satisfy me. I hope you have better luck and your taste buds don&#8217;t do what mine did&#8230;.beg for mercy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Boston</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/03/27/guest-review-13/#comment-90195</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Boston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 23:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/03/27/2008/guest-review-13/#comment-90195</guid>
		<description>good review Weak_link , seems like a good smoke, i am looking forward to enjoying one with a beer soon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good review Weak_link , seems like a good smoke, i am looking forward to enjoying one with a beer soon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave florida</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/03/27/guest-review-13/#comment-87133</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave florida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/03/27/2008/guest-review-13/#comment-87133</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m about 1-2/3 done with this smoke. I must admit, not a prize winner, but great quality at an affordable price(recession)! I got a 5 pck on cigarbid for 11$- the smoke eventually loses the pepper flavor, and reminds me of the park avenue by Gurkha. Taste alot like any other Connecticut.  Suprisingly the burn was pretty even for me And corrected itself.  Strong ash, very creamy and leathery. I recommend this stogie to anyone that wants a graycliff at a good price. This is my excuse for buying these! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m about 1-2/3 done with this smoke. I must admit, not a prize winner, but great quality at an affordable price(recession)! I got a 5 pck on cigarbid for 11$- the smoke eventually loses the pepper flavor, and reminds me of the park avenue by Gurkha. Taste alot like any other Connecticut.  Suprisingly the burn was pretty even for me And corrected itself.  Strong ash, very creamy and leathery. I recommend this stogie to anyone that wants a graycliff at a good price. This is my excuse for buying these! <img src='http://www.stogiereview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: weak_link</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/03/27/guest-review-13/#comment-42331</link>
		<dc:creator>weak_link</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 03:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/03/27/2008/guest-review-13/#comment-42331</guid>
		<description>Funny you mention the band- I also found it not so appealing when I first laid eyes on it.  The other vitolas in the Graycliff line have a fancy foil label and makes the G2 look like a looser.

FWIW my favorite Graycliff is the Professionale PG- the blue one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny you mention the band- I also found it not so appealing when I first laid eyes on it.  The other vitolas in the Graycliff line have a fancy foil label and makes the G2 look like a looser.</p>
<p>FWIW my favorite Graycliff is the Professionale PG- the blue one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon W.</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/03/27/guest-review-13/#comment-42324</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 22:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/03/27/2008/guest-review-13/#comment-42324</guid>
		<description>Just read over the review, nice job Weak_link! Sounds like a good cigar! The only thing that looks wierd about it is the bright yellow band, kinda odd, but I like how they designed the letter &quot;G&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just read over the review, nice job Weak_link! Sounds like a good cigar! The only thing that looks wierd about it is the bright yellow band, kinda odd, but I like how they designed the letter &#8220;G&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.003 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 385/386 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.stogiereview.com @ 2012-02-09 06:16:10 -->
