<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Arturo Fuente Double Chateau Sungrown (Guest Review)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/02/28/guest-review-10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/02/28/guest-review-10/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=guest-review-10</link>
	<description>Cigar reviews with a video twist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:25:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Werner</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/02/28/guest-review-10/#comment-133541</link>
		<dc:creator>John Werner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 04:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=458#comment-133541</guid>
		<description>To me, at any rate, poetry good as tje abpve aside, the taste I get is a sweet caramel; not a earthy musky tobacco profile, but a slightly salty sweet taste with a very (did I say very) light bit of spice.   It&#039;s pleasant and definitely not too sweet, plus, it&#039;s different and not a &quot;me too&quot; cigar.  Yes, it tends to be on the mild side, yet with real character which defines it and it burns absoutely straight and does so for almost an hour and a half.  All in all, it is good and it is unique.  It will not be for everyone as it departs from the earthy and gets more int the territory that polarizes folks.  If you like it, as I do, you will want to keep some in your rotation, perhaps not even a weekly selection, but one that you will go to when you crave something a bit different:  something desert like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me, at any rate, poetry good as tje abpve aside, the taste I get is a sweet caramel; not a earthy musky tobacco profile, but a slightly salty sweet taste with a very (did I say very) light bit of spice.   It&#8217;s pleasant and definitely not too sweet, plus, it&#8217;s different and not a &#8220;me too&#8221; cigar.  Yes, it tends to be on the mild side, yet with real character which defines it and it burns absoutely straight and does so for almost an hour and a half.  All in all, it is good and it is unique.  It will not be for everyone as it departs from the earthy and gets more int the territory that polarizes folks.  If you like it, as I do, you will want to keep some in your rotation, perhaps not even a weekly selection, but one that you will go to when you crave something a bit different:  something desert like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/02/28/guest-review-10/#comment-131091</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 16:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=458#comment-131091</guid>
		<description>Sorry bro but the poetry didnt work as a review very creative an well written stuff but it didnt work as a review, I have no idea of the flavor profile from that review other than either sugar or pecan. It was well done and took alot of creativity tho so..... Props for originality (sp)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry bro but the poetry didnt work as a review very creative an well written stuff but it didnt work as a review, I have no idea of the flavor profile from that review other than either sugar or pecan. It was well done and took alot of creativity tho so&#8230;.. Props for originality (sp)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/02/28/guest-review-10/#comment-40648</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=458#comment-40648</guid>
		<description>Beautiful! Loved the verse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beautiful! Loved the verse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ace</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/02/28/guest-review-10/#comment-40641</link>
		<dc:creator>ace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 22:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=458#comment-40641</guid>
		<description>Clint,

The best I can say is that I liked the ones I have now when I got them a year ago. They aren&#039;t suffering for a year&#039;s age, but I&#039;m not sure they&#039;re getting any better either. I can&#039;t comment on the negative reviews. What I can say is that I&#039;ve smoked hundreds of these and have had one I didn&#039;t like, one that did not draw well. Fuente is right up there in terms of quality control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clint,</p>
<p>The best I can say is that I liked the ones I have now when I got them a year ago. They aren&#8217;t suffering for a year&#8217;s age, but I&#8217;m not sure they&#8217;re getting any better either. I can&#8217;t comment on the negative reviews. What I can say is that I&#8217;ve smoked hundreds of these and have had one I didn&#8217;t like, one that did not draw well. Fuente is right up there in terms of quality control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clint</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2008/02/28/guest-review-10/#comment-40625</link>
		<dc:creator>Clint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=458#comment-40625</guid>
		<description>Hey Ace how about that,  I actually agree with you on this one. Great poem bud. I just ordered some of these as well as some of the smaller ones. It&#039;s funny how as a relatively new smoker I don&#039;t hear much about some of these great smokes that have been around for a while. It&#039;s like you said,  we are being almost overwhelmed by all of the hype of new releases (some of it warranted),  to the point where great  mainstays like these get lost in the shuffle. I probably never would have tried a Fuente Sungrown if JB hadn&#039;t sent me one for Christmas. I can&#039;t wait til my order gets here. Even though I have read some negative reviews on these during my research of them, the one I had ranked right up there with some of the best cigars I have smoked. Is it your experience that these perform better with some age on them?  That is the impression I am getting from what I am reading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Ace how about that,  I actually agree with you on this one. Great poem bud. I just ordered some of these as well as some of the smaller ones. It&#8217;s funny how as a relatively new smoker I don&#8217;t hear much about some of these great smokes that have been around for a while. It&#8217;s like you said,  we are being almost overwhelmed by all of the hype of new releases (some of it warranted),  to the point where great  mainstays like these get lost in the shuffle. I probably never would have tried a Fuente Sungrown if JB hadn&#8217;t sent me one for Christmas. I can&#8217;t wait til my order gets here. Even though I have read some negative reviews on these during my research of them, the one I had ranked right up there with some of the best cigars I have smoked. Is it your experience that these perform better with some age on them?  That is the impression I am getting from what I am reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.003 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 359/360 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.stogiereview.com @ 2012-02-09 06:15:24 -->
