<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Davidoff Millennium Blend</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stogiereview.com/2007/05/16/davidoff-millennium-blend/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2007/05/16/davidoff-millennium-blend/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=davidoff-millennium-blend</link>
	<description>Cigar reviews with a video twist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:42:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: radu</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2007/05/16/davidoff-millennium-blend/#comment-141014</link>
		<dc:creator>radu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 11:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=248#comment-141014</guid>
		<description>Dannyboy, I&#039;m sure both Davidoff and Mercedes are deeply saddened by losing the hillbilly market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dannyboy, I&#8217;m sure both Davidoff and Mercedes are deeply saddened by losing the hillbilly market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dannyboy</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2007/05/16/davidoff-millennium-blend/#comment-94126</link>
		<dc:creator>Dannyboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 13:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=248#comment-94126</guid>
		<description>I smoked the mill blend churchill last night.  Biggest waste of $26 I&#039;ve ever spent!  The draw was too tight and the flavor at times actually tasted like burnt hay.  It was very mild and very unenjoyable.  I lit up a 601 red after that just to get the taste out of my mouth.  I&#039;d never smoked a Davidoff and I don&#039;t believe I ever will again.  Like buyin a Mercedes, looks nice, costs alot, but is a big piece of junk.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I smoked the mill blend churchill last night.  Biggest waste of $26 I&#8217;ve ever spent!  The draw was too tight and the flavor at times actually tasted like burnt hay.  It was very mild and very unenjoyable.  I lit up a 601 red after that just to get the taste out of my mouth.  I&#8217;d never smoked a Davidoff and I don&#8217;t believe I ever will again.  Like buyin a Mercedes, looks nice, costs alot, but is a big piece of junk&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Belicoso</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2007/05/16/davidoff-millennium-blend/#comment-12810</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Belicoso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 04:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=248#comment-12810</guid>
		<description>I say something is better than nothing.  Although I prefer the video reviews, I don&#039;t see how you can complain about free video reviews, podcasts, etc.  So keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say something is better than nothing.  Although I prefer the video reviews, I don&#8217;t see how you can complain about free video reviews, podcasts, etc.  So keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2007/05/16/davidoff-millennium-blend/#comment-12628</link>
		<dc:creator>kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 06:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=248#comment-12628</guid>
		<description>I agree, Brian needs to bust out the video camera and get on par with the other reviews.  While the written reviews are very well done and helpful, you should consider getting on par with the other video offerings on this site, which makes it stand apart from the rest.  If I want written reviews there are tons already being done.  Or you could just keep listening to the site fans gripe about it week after week  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, Brian needs to bust out the video camera and get on par with the other reviews.  While the written reviews are very well done and helpful, you should consider getting on par with the other video offerings on this site, which makes it stand apart from the rest.  If I want written reviews there are tons already being done.  Or you could just keep listening to the site fans gripe about it week after week  <img src='http://www.stogiereview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sawz all</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2007/05/16/davidoff-millennium-blend/#comment-12260</link>
		<dc:creator>sawz all</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 06:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=248#comment-12260</guid>
		<description>Brian, come on man. The site is primarily video reviews.... it&#039;s a let down when a review ISN&#039;T video-based. Time isn&#039;t a good argument, click record, stop, upload, done. So what&#039;s the deal ??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian, come on man. The site is primarily video reviews&#8230;. it&#8217;s a let down when a review ISN&#8217;T video-based. Time isn&#8217;t a good argument, click record, stop, upload, done. So what&#8217;s the deal ??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2007/05/16/davidoff-millennium-blend/#comment-12248</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 05:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=248#comment-12248</guid>
		<description>I was just taking a stab in the dark with the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cigarcyclopedia.com/news/news.php?c=journal&amp;id=676&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;sick period&lt;/a&gt; (way better than I can do Another Brian ;) ), just trying to come up with an excuse why a $9 cigar would perform this poorly.  When this cigar was on it was &lt;b&gt;very&lt;/b&gt; on, but when it wasn&#039;t it was a bad as any dog rocket on the planet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just taking a stab in the dark with the <a href="http://www.cigarcyclopedia.com/news/news.php?c=journal&#038;id=676" rel="nofollow">sick period</a> (way better than I can do Another Brian <img src='http://www.stogiereview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  ), just trying to come up with an excuse why a $9 cigar would perform this poorly.  When this cigar was on it was <b>very</b> on, but when it wasn&#8217;t it was a bad as any dog rocket on the planet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy (Cigar Corner)</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2007/05/16/davidoff-millennium-blend/#comment-12217</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy (Cigar Corner)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 00:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=248#comment-12217</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, I have never ever gotten into Davidoff Cigars. I have tried them a few times and each time was worse than the previous time. I gave up on them and probably will never have another. The price point is outragous as well. Just my .02 Cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, I have never ever gotten into Davidoff Cigars. I have tried them a few times and each time was worse than the previous time. I gave up on them and probably will never have another. The price point is outragous as well. Just my .02 Cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.003 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 390/390 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.stogiereview.com @ 2012-02-09 11:01:18 -->
