Comments on: Davidoff Millennium Blend http://www.stogiereview.com/2007/05/16/davidoff-millennium-blend/ Cigar reviews with a video twist Wed, 28 Jul 2010 18:37:22 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Dannyboy http://www.stogiereview.com/2007/05/16/davidoff-millennium-blend/#comment-94126 Dannyboy Thu, 13 May 2010 13:10:41 +0000 http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=248#comment-94126 I smoked the mill blend churchill last night. Biggest waste of $26 I've ever spent! The draw was too tight and the flavor at times actually tasted like burnt hay. It was very mild and very unenjoyable. I lit up a 601 red after that just to get the taste out of my mouth. I'd never smoked a Davidoff and I don't believe I ever will again. Like buyin a Mercedes, looks nice, costs alot, but is a big piece of junk..... I smoked the mill blend churchill last night. Biggest waste of $26 I’ve ever spent! The draw was too tight and the flavor at times actually tasted like burnt hay. It was very mild and very unenjoyable. I lit up a 601 red after that just to get the taste out of my mouth. I’d never smoked a Davidoff and I don’t believe I ever will again. Like buyin a Mercedes, looks nice, costs alot, but is a big piece of junk…..

]]> By: Don Belicoso http://www.stogiereview.com/2007/05/16/davidoff-millennium-blend/#comment-12810 Don Belicoso Mon, 21 May 2007 04:03:54 +0000 http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=248#comment-12810 I say something is better than nothing. Although I prefer the video reviews, I don't see how you can complain about free video reviews, podcasts, etc. So keep up the good work. I say something is better than nothing. Although I prefer the video reviews, I don’t see how you can complain about free video reviews, podcasts, etc. So keep up the good work.

]]> By: kelly http://www.stogiereview.com/2007/05/16/davidoff-millennium-blend/#comment-12628 kelly Sun, 20 May 2007 06:22:31 +0000 http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=248#comment-12628 I agree, Brian needs to bust out the video camera and get on par with the other reviews. While the written reviews are very well done and helpful, you should consider getting on par with the other video offerings on this site, which makes it stand apart from the rest. If I want written reviews there are tons already being done. Or you could just keep listening to the site fans gripe about it week after week :) I agree, Brian needs to bust out the video camera and get on par with the other reviews. While the written reviews are very well done and helpful, you should consider getting on par with the other video offerings on this site, which makes it stand apart from the rest. If I want written reviews there are tons already being done. Or you could just keep listening to the site fans gripe about it week after week :)

]]> By: sawz all http://www.stogiereview.com/2007/05/16/davidoff-millennium-blend/#comment-12260 sawz all Fri, 18 May 2007 06:11:49 +0000 http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=248#comment-12260 Brian, come on man. The site is primarily video reviews.... it's a let down when a review ISN'T video-based. Time isn't a good argument, click record, stop, upload, done. So what's the deal ?? Brian, come on man. The site is primarily video reviews…. it’s a let down when a review ISN’T video-based. Time isn’t a good argument, click record, stop, upload, done. So what’s the deal ??

]]> By: Brian http://www.stogiereview.com/2007/05/16/davidoff-millennium-blend/#comment-12248 Brian Fri, 18 May 2007 05:13:38 +0000 http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=248#comment-12248 I was just taking a stab in the dark with the <a href="http://www.cigarcyclopedia.com/news/news.php?c=journal&id=676" rel="nofollow">sick period</a> (way better than I can do Another Brian ;) ), just trying to come up with an excuse why a $9 cigar would perform this poorly. When this cigar was on it was <b>very</b> on, but when it wasn't it was a bad as any dog rocket on the planet. I was just taking a stab in the dark with the sick period (way better than I can do Another Brian ;) ), just trying to come up with an excuse why a $9 cigar would perform this poorly. When this cigar was on it was very on, but when it wasn’t it was a bad as any dog rocket on the planet.

]]> By: Jeremy (Cigar Corner) http://www.stogiereview.com/2007/05/16/davidoff-millennium-blend/#comment-12217 Jeremy (Cigar Corner) Fri, 18 May 2007 00:00:48 +0000 http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=248#comment-12217 Hmmm, I have never ever gotten into Davidoff Cigars. I have tried them a few times and each time was worse than the previous time. I gave up on them and probably will never have another. The price point is outragous as well. Just my .02 Cents. Hmmm, I have never ever gotten into Davidoff Cigars. I have tried them a few times and each time was worse than the previous time. I gave up on them and probably will never have another. The price point is outragous as well. Just my .02 Cents.

]]> By: Patrick A http://www.stogiereview.com/2007/05/16/davidoff-millennium-blend/#comment-12198 Patrick A Thu, 17 May 2007 19:31:11 +0000 http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=248#comment-12198 Interesting. We reviewed this cigar back in March and also found some construction flaws, but did not experience any harshness. While the disparity could be a difference in our opinions of "harsh," I'm guessing you somehow got a bad stick. Our review was based on no less than five cigars, and we found the flavor profile to be excellent. Interesting. We reviewed this cigar back in March and also found some construction flaws, but did not experience any harshness.

While the disparity could be a difference in our opinions of “harsh,” I’m guessing you somehow got a bad stick.

Our review was based on no less than five cigars, and we found the flavor profile to be excellent.

]]>