<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Excalibur Royal Sterling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stogiereview.com/2006/11/05/excalibur-royal-sterling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2006/11/05/excalibur-royal-sterling/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=excalibur-royal-sterling</link>
	<description>Cigar reviews with a video twist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:42:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lou dog</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2006/11/05/excalibur-royal-sterling/#comment-3612</link>
		<dc:creator>Lou dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 07:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=144#comment-3612</guid>
		<description>Hey I was wondering if you guys would review the Hoyo de Monterrey Epicure 2. Because it sounds like such a great cigar, but the problem is that I can never find this one. so I would like to hear your guys opinion to get an idea on how good it might be. And I know theres more than one out there so here&#039;s a link so you can check it out. thanks again keep up all the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey I was wondering if you guys would review the Hoyo de Monterrey Epicure 2. Because it sounds like such a great cigar, but the problem is that I can never find this one. so I would like to hear your guys opinion to get an idea on how good it might be. And I know theres more than one out there so here&#8217;s a link so you can check it out. thanks again keep up all the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walt</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2006/11/05/excalibur-royal-sterling/#comment-713</link>
		<dc:creator>Walt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 01:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=144#comment-713</guid>
		<description>Bobby,

I&#039;m glad you enjoyed the review and thank for you for posting a comment.

The Royal Sterling is much milder than the Dark Sumatra and the flavor profile is much different all around.

Since you are looking for a Medium bodied cigar, I would recommend giving this one a try. The Dark Sumatra is heavier in both flavor and body than the Royal Sterling.

In response to your question on a value line cigar, give La Vieja Habana line a try. I have yet to try one of the new ones, but the Corojo is my &quot;Old faithful&quot;. It is a mixed filler cigar that is very inexpensive (When on sale, I just bough 3 boxes at 17.00 each) and I think they are a decent smoke.

You may also want to try the Flor de Oliva line. They are very affordable but lack the smoothness and complexity of bigger named smokes.

And finally, give a Tampa Sweetheart a try. I have not had one personally, but have been told by numerous people that they are an excellent cigar.

I hope that helps to answer your question. 

Again, thanks for the kind words
-Walt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bobby,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad you enjoyed the review and thank for you for posting a comment.</p>
<p>The Royal Sterling is much milder than the Dark Sumatra and the flavor profile is much different all around.</p>
<p>Since you are looking for a Medium bodied cigar, I would recommend giving this one a try. The Dark Sumatra is heavier in both flavor and body than the Royal Sterling.</p>
<p>In response to your question on a value line cigar, give La Vieja Habana line a try. I have yet to try one of the new ones, but the Corojo is my &#8220;Old faithful&#8221;. It is a mixed filler cigar that is very inexpensive (When on sale, I just bough 3 boxes at 17.00 each) and I think they are a decent smoke.</p>
<p>You may also want to try the Flor de Oliva line. They are very affordable but lack the smoothness and complexity of bigger named smokes.</p>
<p>And finally, give a Tampa Sweetheart a try. I have not had one personally, but have been told by numerous people that they are an excellent cigar.</p>
<p>I hope that helps to answer your question. </p>
<p>Again, thanks for the kind words<br />
-Walt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby Wade</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2006/11/05/excalibur-royal-sterling/#comment-712</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby Wade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 00:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=144#comment-712</guid>
		<description>Walt, Great review.  I just found this website a few days ago.  I love it.  I am new to cigars.  This website is great for someone like me.  How does this cigar compare to the Hoyo Dark Sumatra (Media Noche)?  Walt or anyone who reads this post, I am looking for a med. body cigar in a value line for an everyday cigar.  My probelm is am hooked on samplers.  Thanks.

Bobby Wade</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walt, Great review.  I just found this website a few days ago.  I love it.  I am new to cigars.  This website is great for someone like me.  How does this cigar compare to the Hoyo Dark Sumatra (Media Noche)?  Walt or anyone who reads this post, I am looking for a med. body cigar in a value line for an everyday cigar.  My probelm is am hooked on samplers.  Thanks.</p>
<p>Bobby Wade</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 337/338 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.stogiereview.com @ 2012-02-09 10:43:39 -->
