<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: H.Upmann Vintage Cameroon Belicoso (6 x 52)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stogiereview.com/2006/06/22/hupmann-vintage-cameroon-%e2%80%93-belicoso-6-x-52/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2006/06/22/hupmann-vintage-cameroon-%e2%80%93-belicoso-6-x-52/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=hupmann-vintage-cameroon-%25e2%2580%2593-belicoso-6-x-52</link>
	<description>Cigar reviews with a video twist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:11:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Werner</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2006/06/22/hupmann-vintage-cameroon-%e2%80%93-belicoso-6-x-52/#comment-95229</link>
		<dc:creator>John Werner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 06:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=77#comment-95229</guid>
		<description>Well, I expected some trouble after reading the other comments, but I&#039;m glad to say that although the draw wasn&#039;t effortless it was not a deal-breaking problem.  Yes, I&#039;d like more smoke with less effort, but I found the taste rewarding as it was just a nice sweet woodiness with a bit of spice on the front and and a clean finish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I expected some trouble after reading the other comments, but I&#8217;m glad to say that although the draw wasn&#8217;t effortless it was not a deal-breaking problem.  Yes, I&#8217;d like more smoke with less effort, but I found the taste rewarding as it was just a nice sweet woodiness with a bit of spice on the front and and a clean finish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Chup</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2006/06/22/hupmann-vintage-cameroon-%e2%80%93-belicoso-6-x-52/#comment-43837</link>
		<dc:creator>El Chup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 02:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=77#comment-43837</guid>
		<description>I would have to agree with the previous review.  I picked up one of these and couldn&#039;t tell if it stayed lit.  Also, the draw was very tough.  I don&#039;t want to have to work that hard to enjoy a cigar.  The wrapper also seemed pretty weak to me (as in came apart on me).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have to agree with the previous review.  I picked up one of these and couldn&#8217;t tell if it stayed lit.  Also, the draw was very tough.  I don&#8217;t want to have to work that hard to enjoy a cigar.  The wrapper also seemed pretty weak to me (as in came apart on me).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cole M.</title>
		<link>http://www.stogiereview.com/2006/06/22/hupmann-vintage-cameroon-%e2%80%93-belicoso-6-x-52/#comment-35712</link>
		<dc:creator>Cole M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 22:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogiereview.com/?p=77#comment-35712</guid>
		<description>I was not impressed with this one because of the draw. It seemed to me that this cigar didnt produce enough smoke to really give a good review. I dont know if anyone else has the same opinion, but I might as well had smoked air.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was not impressed with this one because of the draw. It seemed to me that this cigar didnt produce enough smoke to really give a good review. I dont know if anyone else has the same opinion, but I might as well had smoked air.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 337/338 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.stogiereview.com @ 2012-02-09 17:31:44 -->
